With advances in Cancer Genomics, Mutation Annotation Format (MAF) is being widely accepted and used to store somatic variants detected. The Cancer Genome Atlas Project has sequenced over 30 different cancers with sample size of each cancer type being over 200. Resulting data consisting of somatic variants are stored in the form of Mutation Annotation Format. This package attempts to summarize, analyze, annotate and visualize MAF files in an efficient manner from either TCGA sources or any in-house studies as long as the data is in MAF format.
Please cite the below if you find this tool useful for you.
Mayakonda, A. & Koeffler, H.P. Maftools: Efficient analysis, visualization and summarization of MAF files
from large-scale cohort based cancer studies. bioRxiv (2016). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/052662
MAF files contain many fields ranging from chromosome names to cosmic annotations. However most of the analysis in maftools uses following fields.
Mandatory fields: Hugo_Symbol, Chromosome, Start_Position, End_Position, Reference_Allele, Tumor_Seq_Allele2, Variant_Classification, Variant_Type and Tumor_Sample_Barcode.
Recommended optional fields: non MAF specific fields containing vaf and amino acid change information.
Complete specification of MAF files can be found on NCI TCGA page.
This vignette demonstrates the usage and application of maftools on an example MAF file from TCGA LAML cohort 1.
maftools functions can be categorized into mainly Visualization and Analysis modules. Each of these functions and a short description is summarized as shown below. Usage is simple, just read your MAF file with read.maf
(along with copy-number data available) and pass the resulting MAF object to the desired function for plotting or analysis.
Amp
or Del
).read.maf
function reads MAF files, summarizes it in various ways and stores it as an MAF object. Even though MAF file is alone enough, it is highly recommended to provide annotations associated with samples in MAF. One can also integrate copy number data if available.
require(maftools)
laml.maf = system.file('extdata', 'tcga_laml.maf.gz', package = 'maftools') #path to TCGA LAML MAF file
laml.clin = system.file('extdata', 'tcga_laml_annot.tsv', package = 'maftools') # clinical information containing survival information and histology. This is optional
laml = read.maf(maf = laml.maf, clinicalData = laml.clin)
Summarized MAF file is stored as an MAF object. MAF object contains main maf file, summarized data and any associated sample annotations.
There are accessor methods to access the useful slots from MAF object.
## An object of class MAF
## ID summary Mean Median
## 1: NCBI_Build 37 NA NA
## 2: Center genome.wustl.edu NA NA
## 3: Samples 192 NA NA
## 4: nGenes 1241 NA NA
## 5: Frame_Shift_Del 52 0.271 0
## 6: Frame_Shift_Ins 91 0.474 0
## 7: In_Frame_Del 10 0.052 0
## 8: In_Frame_Ins 42 0.219 0
## 9: Missense_Mutation 1342 6.990 7
## 10: Nonsense_Mutation 103 0.536 0
## 11: Splice_Site 92 0.479 0
## 12: total 1732 9.021 9
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode Frame_Shift_Del Frame_Shift_Ins In_Frame_Del
## 1: TCGA-AB-3009 0 5 0
## 2: TCGA-AB-2807 1 0 1
## 3: TCGA-AB-2959 0 0 0
## 4: TCGA-AB-3002 0 0 0
## 5: TCGA-AB-2849 0 1 0
## ---
## 188: TCGA-AB-2933 0 0 0
## 189: TCGA-AB-2942 0 0 0
## 190: TCGA-AB-2946 0 0 0
## 191: TCGA-AB-2954 0 0 0
## 192: TCGA-AB-2982 0 0 0
## In_Frame_Ins Missense_Mutation Nonsense_Mutation Splice_Site total
## 1: 1 25 2 1 34
## 2: 0 16 3 4 25
## 3: 0 22 0 1 23
## 4: 0 15 1 5 21
## 5: 0 16 1 2 20
## ---
## 188: 0 1 0 0 1
## 189: 1 0 0 0 1
## 190: 0 1 0 0 1
## 191: 0 1 0 0 1
## 192: 0 1 0 0 1
## Hugo_Symbol Frame_Shift_Del Frame_Shift_Ins In_Frame_Del
## 1: FLT3 0 0 1
## 2: DNMT3A 4 0 0
## 3: NPM1 0 33 0
## 4: IDH2 0 0 0
## 5: IDH1 0 0 0
## ---
## 1237: ZNF689 0 0 0
## 1238: ZNF75D 0 0 0
## 1239: ZNF827 1 0 0
## 1240: ZNF99 0 0 0
## 1241: ZPBP 0 0 0
## In_Frame_Ins Missense_Mutation Nonsense_Mutation Splice_Site total
## 1: 33 15 0 3 52
## 2: 0 39 5 6 54
## 3: 0 1 0 0 34
## 4: 0 20 0 0 20
## 5: 0 18 0 0 18
## ---
## 1237: 0 1 0 0 1
## 1238: 0 1 0 0 1
## 1239: 0 0 0 0 1
## 1240: 0 1 0 0 1
## 1241: 0 1 0 0 1
## MutatedSamples AlteredSamples
## 1: 52 52
## 2: 48 48
## 3: 33 33
## 4: 20 20
## 5: 18 18
## ---
## 1237: 1 1
## 1238: 1 1
## 1239: 1 1
## 1240: 1 1
## 1241: 1 1
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode FAB_classification days_to_last_followup
## 1: TCGA-AB-2802 M4 365
## 2: TCGA-AB-2803 M3 792
## 3: TCGA-AB-2804 M3 2557
## 4: TCGA-AB-2805 M0 577
## 5: TCGA-AB-2806 M1 945
## ---
## 188: TCGA-AB-3007 M3 1581
## 189: TCGA-AB-3008 M1 822
## 190: TCGA-AB-3009 M4 577
## 191: TCGA-AB-3011 M1 1885
## 192: TCGA-AB-3012 M3 1887
## Overall_Survival_Status
## 1: 1
## 2: 1
## 3: 0
## 4: 1
## 5: 1
## ---
## 188: 0
## 189: 1
## 190: 1
## 191: 0
## 192: 0
## [1] "Hugo_Symbol" "Entrez_Gene_Id"
## [3] "Center" "NCBI_Build"
## [5] "Chromosome" "Start_Position"
## [7] "End_Position" "Strand"
## [9] "Variant_Classification" "Variant_Type"
## [11] "Reference_Allele" "Tumor_Seq_Allele1"
## [13] "Tumor_Seq_Allele2" "Tumor_Sample_Barcode"
## [15] "Protein_Change" "i_TumorVAF_WU"
## [17] "i_transcript_name"
We can use plotmafSummary
to plot the summary of the maf file, which displays number of variants in each sample as a stacked barplot and variant types as a boxplot summarized by Variant_Classification. We can add either mean or median line to the stacked barplot to display average/median number of variants across the cohort.
## Warning: Removed 1 rows containing non-finite values (stat_boxplot).
Better representation of maf file can be shown as oncoplots, also known as waterfall plots. Oncoplot function uses “ComplexHeatmap” to draw oncoplots2. To be specific, oncoplot
is a wrapper around ComplexHeatmap’s OncoPrint
function with little modification and automation which makes plotting easier. Side barplot and top barplots can be controlled by drawRowBar
and drawColBar
arguments respectively.
NOTE: Variants annotated as Multi_Hit
are those genes which are mutated more than once in the same sample.
If we have copy number data along with MAF file, we can include them in oncoplot as to show if any genes are amplified or deleted. One most widely used tool for copy number analysis from large scale studies is GISTIC and we can simultaneously read gistic results along with MAF3. GISTIC generates numerous files but we need mainly four files all_lesions.conf_XX.txt
, amp_genes.conf_XX.txt
, del_genes.conf_XX.txt
, scores.gistic
where XX is confidence level. These files contain significantly altered genomic regions along with amplified and deleted genes respectively.
#read TCGA maf file for LAML
laml.maf = system.file('extdata', 'tcga_laml.maf.gz', package = 'maftools')
all.lesions <- system.file("extdata", "all_lesions.conf_99.txt", package = "maftools")
amp.genes <- system.file("extdata", "amp_genes.conf_99.txt", package = "maftools")
del.genes <- system.file("extdata", "del_genes.conf_99.txt", package = "maftools")
scores.gis <- system.file("extdata", "scores.gistic", package = "maftools")
laml.plus.gistic = read.maf(maf = laml.maf, gisticAllLesionsFile = all.lesions, gisticAmpGenesFile = amp.genes, gisticDelGenesFile = del.genes, gisticScoresFile = scores.gis, isTCGA = TRUE)
#We will draw oncoplots for top ten mutated genes. (Removing non-mutated samples from the plot for better visualization)
oncoplot(maf = laml.plus.gistic, top = 10, fontSize = 12)
This plot shows frequent deletions in TP53 gene which is located on one of the significantly deleted locus 17p13.2.
Oncoplots can be further improved by including annotations (clinical features) associated with samples, changing colors for variant classifications and including q-values of significance (either generated from MutSig or similar program). Below plot includes,
One can use SMG list generated from any progrm as long as it contains two required columns titled gene
and q
#Changing colors for variant classifications (You can use any colors, here in this example we will use a color palette from RColorBrewer)
col = RColorBrewer::brewer.pal(n = 8, name = 'Paired')
names(col) = c('Frame_Shift_Del','Missense_Mutation', 'Nonsense_Mutation', 'Multi_Hit', 'Frame_Shift_Ins',
'In_Frame_Ins', 'Splice_Site', 'In_Frame_Del')
#Color coding for FAB classification; try getAnnotations(x = laml) to see available annotations.
fabcolors = RColorBrewer::brewer.pal(n = 8,name = 'Spectral')
names(fabcolors) = c("M0", "M1", "M2", "M3", "M4", "M5", "M6", "M7")
fabcolors = list(FAB_classification = fabcolors)
#MutSig reusults
laml.mutsig <- system.file("extdata", "LAML_sig_genes.txt.gz", package = "maftools")
oncoplot(maf = laml, colors = col, mutsig = laml.mutsig, mutsigQval = 0.01, clinicalFeatures = 'FAB_classification', sortByAnnotation = TRUE, annotationColor = fabcolors)
Also note that using sortByAnnotation = TRUE
further sorts oncoplot according to annotations provided (here FAB_classification) and helps in clear representation of mutational patters within subtypes. For example above plot shows NPM1 is rarely mutated in M0 type of AML whereas RUNX1 is virtually absent in M5 subtype.
We can visualize any set of genes using oncostrip
function, which draws mutations in each sample similar to OncoPrinter tool on cBioPortal. oncostrip
can be used to draw any number of genes using top
or genes
arguments.
titv
function classifies SNPs into Transitions and Transversions and returns a list of summarized tables in various ways. Summarized data can also be visualized as a boxplot showing overall distribution of six different conversions and as a stacked barplot showing fraction of conversions in each sample.
Lollipop plots are simple and most effective way showing mutation spots on protein structure. Many oncogenes have a preferential sites which are mutated more often than any other locus. These spots are considered to be mutational hot-spots and lollipop plots can be used to display them along with rest of the mutations. We can draw such plots using the function lollipopPlot
. This function requires us to have amino acid changes information in the maf file. However MAF files have no clear guidelines on naming the field for amino acid changes, with different studies having different field (or column) names for amino acid changes. By default, lollipopPlot
looks for column AAChange
, and if its not found in the MAF file, it prints all available fields with a warning message. For below example, MAF file contains amino acid changes under a field/column name ‘Protein_Change’. We will manually specify this using argument AACol
. This function also returns the plot as a ggplot object, which user can later modify if needed.
#Lets plot lollipop plot for DNMT3A, which is one of the most frequent mutated gene in Leukemia.
dnmt3a.lpop = lollipopPlot(maf = laml, gene = 'DNMT3A', AACol = 'Protein_Change', showMutationRate = TRUE, domainLabelSize = 3, defaultYaxis = FALSE)
## 3 transcripts available. Use arguments refSeqID or proteinID to manually specify tx name.
## HGNC refseq.ID protein.ID aa.length
## 1: DNMT3A NM_175629 NP_783328 912
## 2: DNMT3A NM_022552 NP_072046 912
## 3: DNMT3A NM_153759 NP_715640 723
## Using longer transcript NM_175629 for now.
## Removed 3 mutations for which AA position was not available
Note that lollipopPlot
warns user on availability of different transcripts for the given gene. If we know the transcript id before hand, we can specify it as refSeqID
or proteinID
. By default lollipopPlot uses the longer isoform.
We can also label points on the lollipopPlot
using argument labelPos
. If labelPos
is set to ‘all’, all of the points are highlighted.
MutationMapper on cBioPortal collapses Variant Classifications into truncating and others. It also includes somatic mutation rate.
Many cancer genomic studies involve copy number data generated either from sequencing or SNP chip arrays. Copy number analysis provides us a lot of information from genome wide copy number aberrations to tumor purity. Most of the time copy number data is stored as segments, with each segment represented by a log ratio of copy number changes compared to matched normals. There are many segmentation algorithms, with the most popular being Circular Binary Segmentation implemented in “DNACopy” 4. We can plot such segmented copy number data and map all mutations on to it. It provides a quick way of knowing which variants (in a way which genes) are located on copy number altered genomic regions.
tcga.ab.009.seg <- system.file("extdata", "TCGA.AB.3009.hg19.seg.txt", package = "maftools")
plotCBSsegments(cbsFile = tcga.ab.009.seg, maf = laml, labelAll = TRUE)
## Warning: Ignoring unknown aesthetics: label
## Warning: Removed 30 rows containing missing values (geom_segment).
Above plot shows two genes NF1 and SUZ12 are located on a region which has a shallow deletion. Later we will also see how these variants on copy number altered regions affect variant allele frequencies and tumor heterogeneity estimation.
Cancer genomes, especially solid tumors are characterized by genomic loci with localized hyper-mutations 5. Such hyper mutated genomic regions can be visualized by plotting inter variant distance on a linear genomic scale. These plots generally called rainfall plots and we can draw such plots using rainfallPlot
. If detectChangePoints
is set to TRUE, rainfall
plot also highlights regions where potential changes in inter-event distances are located.
## Processing TCGA.AG.A002.01..
## Change points detected at:
## Chromosome Start_Position End_Position nMuts Avg_intermutation_dist
## 1: 1 150459281 150595840 19 7586.61
## 2: 2 179106225 179359080 85 3010.18
## 3: 5 140161299 140845781 92 7521.78
## 4: 13 22803110 22813071 14 766.23
## 5: 19 8907340 8950788 28 1609.19
## Size C>A C>T T>C C>G T>A T>G Filter
## 1: 136559 8 9 2 NA NA NA .
## 2: 252855 31 37 6 1 3 7 .
## 3: 684482 32 46 6 1 1 6 .
## 4: 9961 6 2 1 NA NA 5 PASS
## 5: 43448 15 8 3 NA NA 2 .
Filter
column in the above results indicate whether the identified segment passes the definition of “Kataegis” which are defined as those genomic segments containing six or more consecutive mutations with an average inter-mutation distance of less than or equal to 1,00 bp 5.
TCGA contains over 30 different cancer cohorts and median mutation load across them varies from as low as 7 per exome (Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma arising from Adrenal Gland) to as high as 315 per exome (Skin Cutaneoys Melanoma). It is informative to see how mutation load in given maf stands against TCGA cohorts. This can can be achieved with the function tcgaComapre
which draws distribution of variants compiled from over 10,000 WXS samples across 33 TCGA landmark cohorts. Plot generated is similar to the one described in Alexandrov et al 5.
This function plots Variant Allele Frequencies as a boxplot which quickly helps to estimate clonal status of top mutated genes (clonal genes usually have mean allele frequency around ~50% assuming pure sample)
## Warning: Removed 7 rows containing missing values (geom_point).
We can plot word cloud plot for mutated genes with the function geneCloud
. Size of each gene is proportional to the total number of samples in which it is mutated/altered.
We can summarize output files generated by GISTIC programme. As mentioned earlier, we need four files that are generated by GISTIC, i.e, all_lesions.conf_XX.txt, amp_genes.conf_XX.txt, del_genes.conf_XX.txt and scores.gistic, where XX is the confidence level. See GISTIC documentation for details.
all.lesions <- system.file("extdata", "all_lesions.conf_99.txt", package = "maftools")
amp.genes <- system.file("extdata", "amp_genes.conf_99.txt", package = "maftools")
del.genes <- system.file("extdata", "del_genes.conf_99.txt", package = "maftools")
scores.gis <- system.file("extdata", "scores.gistic", package = "maftools")
laml.gistic = readGistic(gisticAllLesionsFile = all.lesions, gisticAmpGenesFile = amp.genes, gisticDelGenesFile = del.genes, gisticScoresFile = scores.gis, isTCGA = TRUE)
## Processing Gistic files..
## Processing amp_genes.conf_99.txt..
## Processing del_genes.conf_99.txt..
## Processing scores.gistic..
## Summarizing samples..
## An object of class GISTIC
## ID summary
## 1: Samples 66
## 2: nGenes 2622
## 3: cytoBands 16
## 4: Amp 388
## 5: Del 26481
## 6: total 26869
Similar to MAF objects, there are methods available to access slots of GISTIC object - getSampleSummary
, getGeneSummary
and getCytoBandSummary
. Summarized results can be written to output files using function write.GisticSummary
.
There are three types of plots available to visualize gistic results.
## Warning: Ignoring unknown aesthetics: label
This is similar to oncoplots except for copy number data. One can again sort the matrix according to annotations, if any. Below plot is the gistic results for LAML, sorted according to FAB classification. Plot shows that 7q deletions are virtually absent in M4 subtype where as it is widespread in other subtypes.
Many disease causing genes in cancer are co-occurring or show strong exclusiveness in their mutation pattern. Such mutually exclusive or co-occurring set of genes can be detected using somaticInteractions
function, which performs pair-wise Fisher’s Exact test to detect such significant pair of genes. somaticInteractions
function also uses cometExactTest
to identify potentially altered gene sets involving >2 two genes 6.
#We will run mutExclusive on top 10 mutated genes.
somaticInteractions(maf = laml, top = 25, pvalue = c(0.05, 0.1))
## gene_set pvalue
## 1: TP53, FLT3, RUNX1 4.830385e-05
## 2: TP53, IDH2, FLT3 8.596593e-05
## 3: TP53, RUNX1, DNMT3A 5.109811e-03
## $pairs
## gene1 gene2 pValue oddsRatio 00 11 01 10 Event
## 1: RUNX1 ASXL1 0.0001573764 54.9015813 175 4 1 12 Co_Occurance
## 2: RUNX1 IDH2 0.0002906170 9.5325828 163 7 13 9 Co_Occurance
## 3: IDH2 ASXL1 0.0004114350 40.8398240 171 4 1 16 Co_Occurance
## 4: FLT3 NPM1 0.0010412734 3.7331578 124 17 16 35 Co_Occurance
## 5: SMC3 DNMT3A 0.0010773516 20.0377249 143 6 42 1 Co_Occurance
## 6: NPM1 DNMT3A 0.0015025851 3.7040763 127 16 32 17 Co_Occurance
## 7: DNMT3A IDH1 0.0035284498 4.4297316 136 10 8 38 Co_Occurance
## 8: TTN ASXL1 0.0078402697 28.3054161 183 2 3 4 Co_Occurance
## 9: RUNX1 PHF6 0.0082268971 12.8927337 173 3 3 13 Co_Occurance
## 10: RUNX1 TTN 0.0082268971 12.8927337 173 3 3 13 Co_Occurance
## 11: TP53 FLT3 0.0124927250 0.0000000 125 NA 52 15 Mutually_Exclusive
## 12: STAG2 PTPN11 0.0266587778 12.3227338 179 2 7 4 Co_Occurance
## 13: IDH2 NPM1 0.0276230694 0.0000000 139 NA 33 20 Mutually_Exclusive
## 14: IDH2 KRAS 0.0387926319 5.7982788 167 3 5 17 Co_Occurance
## 15: WT1 PHF6 0.0468111161 8.5748381 176 2 4 10 Co_Occurance
## 16: NPM1 PTPN11 0.0487632619 4.2029330 154 4 5 29 Co_Occurance
## 17: IDH2 PLCE1 0.0545842683 9.2259294 170 2 2 18 Co_Occurance
## 18: NPM1 SMC1A 0.0643753304 5.1344612 156 3 3 30 Co_Occurance
## 19: NRAS CEBPA 0.0686935030 4.1246702 167 3 10 12 Co_Occurance
## 20: FLT3 RUNX1 0.0741280180 0.1643861 125 1 15 51 Mutually_Exclusive
## 21: FAM5C EZH2 0.0764974855 21.5855527 185 1 2 4 Co_Occurance
## 22: RUNX1 DNMT3A 0.0776417572 0.1840255 129 1 47 15 Mutually_Exclusive
## 23: NPM1 TP53 0.0782787771 0.0000000 144 NA 15 33 Mutually_Exclusive
## 24: RUNX1 NPM1 0.0788398517 0.0000000 143 NA 33 16 Mutually_Exclusive
## 25: RUNX1 STAG2 0.0803208954 6.0319705 172 2 4 14 Co_Occurance
## 26: TET2 STAG2 0.0897149618 5.6062361 171 2 4 15 Co_Occurance
## 27: DNMT3A FLT3 0.0902829421 1.9339713 110 18 34 30 Co_Occurance
## 28: NPM1 IDH1 0.0922742345 2.7040207 147 6 12 27 Co_Occurance
## gene1 gene2 pValue oddsRatio 00 11 01 10 Event
##
## $gene_sets
## gene_set pvalue
## 1: TP53, FLT3, RUNX1 4.830385e-05
## 2: TP53, IDH2, FLT3 8.596593e-05
## 3: TP53, RUNX1, DNMT3A 5.109811e-03
We can visualize the above results using oncostrip
. For example, in above analysis, gene set TP53, FLT3 and RUNX1 show a strong exclusiveness with each other a p-value of 4.8e-5.
maftools has a function oncodrive
which identifies cancer genes (driver) from a given MAF. oncodrive
is a based on algorithm oncodriveCLUST which was originally implemented in Python. Concept is based on the fact that most of the variants in cancer causing genes are enriched at few specific loci (aka hot-spots). This method takes advantage of such positions to identify cancer genes. If you use this function, please cite OncodriveCLUST article 7.
laml.sig = oncodrive(maf = laml, AACol = 'Protein_Change', minMut = 5, pvalMethod = 'zscore')
head(laml.sig)
We can plot the results using plotOncodrive
.
plotOncodrive
plots the results as scatter plot with size of the points proportional to the number of clusters found in the gene. X-axis shows number of mutations (or fraction of mutations) observed in these clusters. In the above example, IDH1 has a single cluster and all of the 18 mutations are accumulated within that cluster, giving it a cluster score of one. For details on oncodrive algorithm, please refer to OncodriveCLUST article 7.
maftools comes with the function pfamDomains
, which adds pfam domain information to the amino acid changes. pfamDomain
also summarizes amino acid changes according to the domains that are affected. This serves the purpose of knowing what domain in given cancer cohort, is most frequently affected. This function is inspired from Pfam annotation module from MuSic tool 8.
## Removed 50 mutations for which AA position was not available
#Protein summary (Printing first 7 columns for display convenience)
laml.pfam$proteinSummary[,1:7, with = FALSE]
## HGNC AAPos Variant_Classification N total fraction DomainLabel
## 1: DNMT3A 882 Missense_Mutation 27 54 0.5000000 AdoMet_MTases
## 2: IDH1 132 Missense_Mutation 18 18 1.0000000 PTZ00435
## 3: IDH2 140 Missense_Mutation 17 20 0.8500000 PTZ00435
## 4: FLT3 835 Missense_Mutation 14 52 0.2692308 PKc_like
## 5: FLT3 599 In_Frame_Ins 10 52 0.1923077 PKc_like
## ---
## 1512: ZNF646 875 Missense_Mutation 1 1 1.0000000 NA
## 1513: ZNF687 554 Missense_Mutation 1 2 0.5000000 NA
## 1514: ZNF687 363 Missense_Mutation 1 2 0.5000000 NA
## 1515: ZNF75D 5 Missense_Mutation 1 1 1.0000000 NA
## 1516: ZNF827 427 Frame_Shift_Del 1 1 1.0000000 NA
#Domain summary (Printing first 3 columns for display convenience)
laml.pfam$domainSummary[,1:3, with = FALSE]
## DomainLabel nMuts nGenes
## 1: PKc_like 55 5
## 2: PTZ00435 38 2
## 3: AdoMet_MTases 33 1
## 4: 7tm_1 24 24
## 5: COG5048 17 17
## ---
## 499: ribokinase 1 1
## 500: rim_protein 1 1
## 501: sigpep_I_bact 1 1
## 502: trp 1 1
## 503: zf-BED 1 1
Above plot and results shows AdoMet_MTases domain is frequently mutated, but number genes with this domain is just one (DNMT3A) compared to other domains such as 7tm_1 domain, which is mutated across 24 different genes. This shows the importance of mutations in methyl transfer domains in Leukemia.
Lawrence et al performed MutSigCV analysis on 21 cancer cohorts and identified over 200 genes to be significantly mutated which consists of previously undescribed novel genes 9. Their results show only few genes are mutated in multiple cohort while many of them are tissue/cohort specific. We can compare mutSig results against this pan-can list of significantly mutated genes to see genes specifically mutated in given cohort. This function requires MutSigCV results (usually named sig_genes.txt) as an input.
#MutsigCV results for TCGA-AML
laml.mutsig <- system.file("extdata", "LAML_sig_genes.txt.gz", package = "maftools")
laml.pancan = pancanComparison(mutsigResults = laml.mutsig, qval = 0.1, cohortName = 'LAML', inputSampleSize = 200, label = 1, normSampleSize = TRUE)
## Significantly mutated genes in LAML (q < 0.1): 23
## Significantly mutated genes in PanCan cohort (q <0.1): 114
## Significantly mutated genes exclusive to LAML (q < 0.1):
## gene pancan q nMut
## 1: CEBPA 1.000 3.500301e-12 13
## 2: EZH2 1.000 7.463546e-05 3
## 3: GIGYF2 1.000 6.378338e-03 2
## 4: KIT 0.509 1.137517e-05 8
## 5: PHF6 0.783 6.457555e-09 6
## 6: PTPN11 0.286 7.664584e-03 9
## 7: RAD21 0.929 1.137517e-05 5
## 8: SMC1A 0.801 2.961696e-03 6
## 9: TET2 0.907 2.281625e-13 17
## 10: WT1 1.000 2.281625e-13 12
Above results show genes such as CEBPa, TET2 and WT1 are specifically mutated in Leukemia.
Survival analysis is an essential part of cohort based sequencing projects. Function mafSurvive
performs survival analysis and draws kaplan meier curve by grouping samples based on mutation status of user defined gene(s) or manually provided samples those make up a group. This function requires input data to contain Tumor_Sample_Barcode (make sure they match to those in MAF file), binary event (1/0) and time to event.
Our annotation data already contains survival information and in case you have survival data stored in a separate table provide them via argument clinicalData
#Survival analysis based on grouping of DNMT3A mutation status
laml.dnmt3a.surv = mafSurvival(maf = laml, genes = 'DNMT3A', time = 'days_to_last_followup', Status = 'Overall_Survival_Status', isTCGA = TRUE)
## Looking for clinical data in annoatation slot of MAF..
## Number of mutated samples for given genes:
## DNMT3A
## 48
## Median survival..
## Group medianTime N
## 1: Mutant 243 48
## 2: WT 366 144
Cancers differ from each other in terms of their mutation pattern. We can compare two different cohorts to detect such differentially mutated genes. For example, recent article by Madan et. al 9, have shown that patients with relapsed APL (Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia) tends to have mutations in PML and RARA genes, which were absent during primary stage of the disease. This difference between two cohorts (in this case primary and relapse APL) can be detected using function mafComapre
, which performs fisher test on all genes between two cohorts to detect differentially mutated genes.
#Primary APL MAF
primary.apl = system.file("extdata", "APL_primary.maf.gz", package = "maftools")
primary.apl = read.maf(maf = primary.apl)
#Relapse APL MAF
relapse.apl = system.file("extdata", "APL_relapse.maf.gz", package = "maftools")
relapse.apl = read.maf(maf = relapse.apl)
#We will consider only genes which are mutated in at-least in 5 samples in one of the cohort, to avoid bias due to single mutated genes.
pt.vs.rt <- mafCompare(m1 = primary.apl, m2 = relapse.apl, m1Name = 'PrimaryAPL', m2Name = 'RelapseAPL', minMut = 5)
print(pt.vs.rt)
## $results
## Hugo_Symbol PrimaryAPL RelapseAPL pval or ci.up
## 1: PML 1 11 3.276258e-05 0.03868764 0.0008765166
## 2: RARA 0 7 4.332703e-04 0.00000000 0.0000000000
## 3: FLT3 26 4 8.883112e-03 4.26676459 1.3552412834
## 4: RUNX1 1 5 1.866537e-02 0.09738200 0.0020113363
## 5: ARID1B 5 8 6.207511e-02 0.29480926 0.0714860893
## 6: NRAS 15 4 3.004921e-01 2.13939926 0.6316876315
## 7: WT1 20 14 4.118662e-01 0.68823250 0.2924505351
## 8: KRAS 6 1 4.224665e-01 3.27572809 0.3808369479
## 9: ARID1A 7 4 1.000000e+00 0.91445360 0.2192017782
## ci.low adjPval
## 1: 0.2818500 0.0002948632
## 2: 0.3346038 0.0019497163
## 3: 17.9013510 0.0266493374
## 4: 0.9055227 0.0419970785
## 5: 1.0915108 0.1117351977
## 6: 9.3745934 0.4507381202
## 7: 1.6486725 0.4752748561
## 8: 154.5190905 0.4752748561
## 9: 4.4805164 1.0000000000
##
## $SampleSummary
## Cohort SampleSize
## 1: PrimaryAPL 97
## 2: RelapseAPL 51
Above results show two genes PML and RARA which are highly mutated in Relapse APL compared to Primary APL. We can visualize these results as a forestplot.
Another alternative way of displaying above results is by plotting two oncoplots side by side. coOncoplot
function takes two maf objects and plots them side by side for better comparison.
Tumors are generally heterogeneous i.e, consist of multiple clones. This heterogeneity can be inferred by clustering variant allele frequencies. inferHeterogeneity
function uses vaf information to cluster variants (using mclust
), to infer clonality. By default, inferHeterogeneity
function looks for column t_vaf containing vaf information. However, if the field name is different from t_vaf, we can manually specify it using argument vafCol
. For example, in this case study vaf is stored under the field name i_TumorVAF_WU.
#We will run this for sample TCGA.AB.2972
tcga.ab.2972.het = inferHeterogeneity(maf = laml, tsb = 'TCGA-AB-2972', vafCol = 'i_TumorVAF_WU')
## Processing TCGA-AB-2972..
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode cluster meanVaf
## 1: TCGA-AB-2972 2 0.4496571
## 2: TCGA-AB-2972 1 0.2454750
## 3: TCGA-AB-2972 outlier 0.3695000
Above figure shows clear separation of two clones clustered at mean variant allele frequencies of ~45% (major clone) and another minor clone at variant allele frequency of ~25%.
Although clustering of variant allele frequencies gives us a fair idea on heterogeneity, it is also possible to measure the extent of heterogeneity in terms of a numerical value. MATH score (mentioned as a subtitle in above plot) is a simple quantitative measure of intra-tumor heterogeneity, which calculates the width of the vaf distribution. Higher MATH scores are found to be associated with poor outcome. MATH score can also be used a proxy variable for survival analysis 10.
We can use copy number information to ignore variants located on copynumber altered regions. Copy number alterations results in abnormally high/low variant allele frequencies, which tends to affect clustering. Removing such variants improves clustering and density estimation while retaining biologically meaningful results. Copy number information can be provided as a segmented file generated from segmentation programmes, such as Circular Binary Segmentation from “DNACopy” Bioconductor package 6.
seg = system.file('extdata', 'TCGA.AB.3009.hg19.seg.txt', package = 'maftools')
tcga.ab.3009.het = inferHeterogeneity(maf = laml, tsb = 'TCGA-AB-3009', segFile = seg, vafCol = 'i_TumorVAF_WU')
## Processing TCGA-AB-3009..
## Removed 1 variants with no copy number data.
## Hugo_Symbol Chromosome Start_Position End_Position Tumor_Sample_Barcode
## 1: PHF6 23 133551224 133551224 TCGA-AB-3009
## t_vaf Segment_Start Segment_End Segment_Mean CN
## 1: 0.9349112 NA NA NA NA
## Copy number altered variants:
## Hugo_Symbol Chromosome Start_Position End_Position Tumor_Sample_Barcode
## 1: NF1 17 29562981 29562981 TCGA-AB-3009
## 2: SUZ12 17 30293198 30293198 TCGA-AB-3009
## t_vaf Segment_Start Segment_End Segment_Mean CN cluster
## 1: 0.8419000 29054355 30363868 -0.9157 1.060173 CN_altered
## 2: 0.8958333 29054355 30363868 -0.9157 1.060173 CN_altered
#Visualizing results. Highlighting those variants on copynumber altered variants.
plotClusters(clusters = tcga.ab.3009.het, genes = 'CN_altered', showCNvars = TRUE)
Above figure shows two genes NF1 and SUZ12 with high VAF’s, which is due to copy number alterations (deletion). Those two genes are ignored from analysis.
Every cancer, as it progresses leaves a signature characterized by specific pattern of nucleotide substitutions. Alexandrov et.al have shown such mutational signatures, derived from over 7000 cancer samples 5. Such signatures can be extracted by decomposing matrix of nucleotide substitutions, classified into 96 substitution classes based on immediate bases surrounding the mutated base. Extracted signatures can also be compared to those validated signatures.
First step in signature analysis is to obtain the adjacent bases surrounding the mutated base and form a mutation matrix. NOTE: Even-though reading fasta and extracting bases is fairly fast, it is a memory consuming process as it occupies ~3gb of memory while running.
#First we extract adjacent bases to the mutated locus and clssify them into 96 substitution classes. This also estimates APOBEC enrichment per sample.
laml.tnm = trinucleotideMatrix(maf = laml, ref_genome = '/path/to/hg19.fa',
prefix = 'chr', add = TRUE, ignoreChr = 'chr23', useSyn = TRUE)
# reading /path/to/hg19.fa (this might take few minutes)..
# Extracting 5' and 3' adjacent bases..
# Extracting +/- 20bp around mutated bases for background estimation..
# Estimating APOBEC enrichment scores..
# Performing one-way Fisher's test for APOBEC enrichment..
# APOBEC related mutations are enriched in 2.674% of samples (APOBEC enrichment score > 2 ; 5 of 187 samples)
# Creating mutation matrix..
# matrix of dimension 193x96
Above function performs two steps:
APOBEC induced mutations are more frequent in solid tumors and are mainly associated with C>T transition events occurring in TCW motif. APOBEC enrichment scores in the above command are estimated using the method described by Roberts et al 12. Briefly, enrichment of C>T mutations occurring within TCW motif over all of the C>T mutations in a given sample is compared to background Cytosines and TCWs occurring within 20bp of mutated bases.
\[\frac{n_{tCw} * background_C}{n_C * background_{TCW}}\]
One-sided fishers exact test is also performed to statistically evaluate the enrichment score, as described in original study by Roberts et al.
We can also analyze the differences in mutational patterns between APOBEC enriched and non-APOBEC enriched samples. plotApobecDiff
is a function which takes APOBEC enrichment scores estimated by trinucleotideMatrix
and classifies samples into APOBEC enriched and non-APOBEC enriched. Once stratified, it compares these two groups to identify differentially altered genes.
Note that, LAML with no APOBEC enrichments, is not an ideal cohort for this sort of analysis and hence below plot is only for demonstration purpose.
## $results
## Hugo_Symbol Enriched nonEnriched pval or ci.up
## 1: TP53 2 13 0.05851471 7.905806 0.6100479
## 2: FLT3 2 43 0.60324507 1.975770 0.1600477
## 3: CEBPA 0 12 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## 4: IDH1 0 18 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## 5: IDH2 0 18 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## ---
## 132: WAC 0 2 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## 133: ZBTB33 0 2 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## 134: ZC3H18 0 2 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## 135: ZNF687 0 2 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## 136: RUNX1 0 15 1.00000000 0.000000 0.0000000
## ci.low adjPval
## 1: 75.73718 1
## 2: 17.84629 1
## 3: 16.05102 1
## 4: 9.97986 1
## 5: 9.97986 1
## ---
## 132: 199.22196 1
## 133: 199.22196 1
## 134: 199.22196 1
## 135: 199.22196 1
## 136: 12.36252 1
##
## $SampleSummary
## Cohort SampleSize Mean Median
## 1: Enriched 5 7.200 6
## 2: nonEnriched 171 9.772 9
extractSignatures
uses non-negative matrix factorization to decompose nx96 dimension matrix into r signatures, where n is the number of samples from input MAF 11. By default function runs nmf on 6 ranks and chooses the best possible value based on maximum cophenetic-correlation coefficient. It is also possible to manually specify r. Once decomposed, signatures are compared against known signatures derived from Alexandrov et.al, and cosine similarity is calculated to identify best match.
#Run main function with maximum 6 signatures.
require('NMF')
laml.sign = extractSignatures(mat = laml.tnm, nTry = 6, plotBestFitRes = FALSE)
# Warning : Found zero mutations for conversions A[T>G]C
#Comparing against experimentally validated 30 signatures.. (See http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/signatures for details.)
#Found Signature_1 most similar to validated Signature_1. Aetiology: spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine [cosine-similarity: 0.767]
#Found Signature_2 most similar to validated Signature_1. Aetiology: spontaneous deamination of 5-methylcytosine [cosine-similarity: 0.757]
extractSignatures
gives a warning that no mutations are found for class A[T>G]C conversions. This is possible when the number of samples are low or in tumors with low mutation rate, such as in this case of Leukemia. In this scenario, a small positive value is added to avoid computational difficulties. It also prints other statistics for range of values that was tried, and chooses the rank with highest cophenetic metric (for above example r=2). Above stats should give an estimate of range of best possible r values and in case the chosen r is overfitted/underfitted, it is also possible to be re-run extractSignatures
by manually specifying r.
Once decomposed, signatures are compared against known and validated signatures from Sanger 11. See here for list of validated signatures. In the above example, 2 signatures are derived, which are similar to validated Signature-1. Signature_1 is a result of elevated rate of spontaneous deamination of 5-methyl-cytosine, resulting in C>T transitions and predominantly occurs at NpCpG trinucleotide, which is a most common process in AML 12.
Full table of cosine similarities against validated signatures are also returned, which can be further analysed. Below plot shows comparison of similarities of detected signatures against validated signatures.
## Loading required package: pheatmap
NOTE: Should you receive an error while running extractSignatures
complaining none of the packages are loaded
, please manually load the “NMF” library and re-run.
plotSignatures
also plots signature contribution as a barplot.
Alternatively, you can perform PCA to stratify samples based on signature contribution. Once again note that, AML is not an ideal cohort for signature analysis, and this should be interpreted carefully.
nsig = ncol(laml.sign$signatures) #number of signatures identified
contrib = t(laml.sign$contributions) #contribution of signatures in every sample
require('ggfortify')
## Loading required package: ggfortify
## Loading required package: ggplot2
We can also annotate variants using oncotator API 13. oncotate
function quires oncotator web api to annotate given set of variants and converts them into MAF format. Input should be a five column file with chr, start, end, ref_allele, alt_allele. However, it can contain other information such as sample names (Tumor_Sample_Barcode), read counts, vaf information and so on, but only first five columns will be used, rest of the columns will be attached at the end of the table.
var.file = system.file('extdata', 'variants.tsv', package = 'maftools')
#This is what input looks like
var = read.delim(var.file, sep = '\t')
head(var)
## chromsome start end ref alt Tumor_Sample_Barcode
## 1 chr4 55589774 55589774 A G fake_1
## 2 chr4 55599321 55599321 A T fake_2
## 3 chr4 55599332 55599332 G T fake_3
## 4 chr4 55599320 55599320 G T fake_4
## 5 chr15 41961117 41961123 TGGCTAA - fake_4
## 6 chr4 55599320 55599320 G T fake_5
NOTE: This is quite time consuming if input is big.
Annovar is one of the most widely used Variant Annotation tool in Genomics 14. Annovar output is generally in a tabular format with various annotation columns. This function converts such annovar output files into MAF. This function requires that annovar was run with gene based annotation as a first operation, before including any filter or region based annotations.
e.g, table_annovar.pl example/ex1.avinput humandb/ -buildver hg19 -out myanno -remove -protocol (refGene),cytoBand,dbnsfp30a -operation (g),r,f -nastring NA
annovarToMaf
mainly uses gene based annotations for processing, rest of the annotation columns from input file will be attached to the end of the resulting MAF.
As an example we will annotate the same file which was used above to run oncotate
function. We will annotate it using annovar with the following command. For simplicity, here we are including only gene based annotations but one can include as many annotations as they wish. But make sure the fist operation is always gene based annotation.
$perl table_annovar.pl variants.tsv ~/path/to/humandb/ -buildver hg19
-out variants --otherinfo -remove -protocol ensGene -operation g -nastring NA
Output generated is stored as a part of this package. We can convert this annovar output into MAF using annovarToMaf
.
var.annovar = system.file("extdata", "variants.hg19_multianno.txt", package = "maftools")
var.annovar.maf = annovarToMaf(annovar = var.annovar, Center = 'CSI-NUS', refBuild = 'hg19',
tsbCol = 'Tumor_Sample_Barcode', table = 'ensGene')
## Converting Ensemble Gene IDs into HGNC gene symbols.
## Done! Original ensemble gene IDs are preserved under field name ens_id
## Hugo_Symbol Entrez_Gene_Id Center NCBI_Build Chromosome
## 1: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 2: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 3: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 4: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 5: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 6: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 7: KIT NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr4
## 8: MGA NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr15
## 9: MGA NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr15
## 10: MGA NA CSI-NUS hg19 chr15
## Start_Position End_Position Strand Variant_Classification Variant_Type
## 1: 55589774 55589774 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 2: 55599321 55599321 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 3: 55599332 55599332 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 4: 55599320 55599320 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 5: 55599320 55599320 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 6: 55599321 55599321 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 7: 55599320 55599320 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 8: 41989106 41989106 + Frame_Shift_Ins INS
## 9: 41961117 41961123 + Frame_Shift_Del DEL
## 10: 41989106 41989106 + Frame_Shift_Ins INS
## Reference_Allele Tumor_Seq_Allele1 Tumor_Seq_Allele2 dbSNP_RS
## 1: A A G NA
## 2: A A T NA
## 3: G G T NA
## 4: G G T NA
## 5: G G T NA
## 6: A A T NA
## 7: G G C NA
## 8: - - TAAAGGGC NA
## 9: TGGCTAA TGGCTAA - NA
## 10: - - TAAAGGGC NA
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode Mutation_Status AAChange Transcript_Id
## 1: fake_1 Somatic p.D419G ENST00000412167
## 2: fake_2 Somatic p.D812V ENST00000412167
## 3: fake_3 Somatic p.D816Y ENST00000412167
## 4: fake_4 Somatic p.D812Y ENST00000412167
## 5: fake_5 Somatic p.D812Y ENST00000412167
## 6: fake_6 Somatic p.D812V ENST00000412167
## 7: fake_7 Somatic p.D812H ENST00000412167
## 8: fake_7 Somatic p.G633fs ENST00000566718
## 9: fake_4 Somatic p.L9fs ENST00000566718
## 10: fake_5 Somatic p.G633fs ENST00000566718
## TxChange GeneDetail.refGene hgnc_symbol Entrez
## 1: c.A1256G NA KIT NA
## 2: c.A2435T NA KIT NA
## 3: c.G2446T NA KIT NA
## 4: c.G2434T NA KIT NA
## 5: c.G2434T NA KIT NA
## 6: c.A2435T NA KIT NA
## 7: c.G2434C NA KIT NA
## 8: c.1898_1899insTAAAGGGC NA MGA NA
## 9: c.25_31del NA MGA NA
## 10: c.1898_1899insTAAAGGGC NA MGA NA
## ens_id
## 1: ENSG00000157404
## 2: ENSG00000157404
## 3: ENSG00000157404
## 4: ENSG00000157404
## 5: ENSG00000157404
## 6: ENSG00000157404
## 7: ENSG00000157404
## 8: ENSG00000174197
## 9: ENSG00000174197
## 10: ENSG00000174197
Annovar, when used with Ensemble as a gene annotation source, uses ensemble gene IDs as Gene names. In that case, use annovarToMaf
with argument table
set to ensGene
which converts ensemble gene IDs into HGNC symbols.
Just like TCGA, International Cancer Genome Consortium ICGC also makes its data publicly available. But the data are stored in Simpale Somatic Mutation Format, which is similar to MAF format in its structure. However field names and classification of variants is different from that of MAF. icgcSimpleMutationToMAF
is a function which reads ICGC data and converts them to MAF.
#Read sample ICGC data for ESCA
esca.icgc <- system.file("extdata", "simple_somatic_mutation.open.ESCA-CN.sample.tsv.gz", package = "maftools")
esca.maf <- icgcSimpleMutationToMAF(icgc = esca.icgc, addHugoSymbol = TRUE)
## Converting Ensemble Gene IDs into HGNC gene symbols.
## Done! Original ensemble gene IDs are preserved under field name ens_id
## NOTE: Removed 427 duplicated variants
## Hugo_Symbol Entrez_Gene_Id Center NCBI_Build Chromosome Start_Position
## 1: AC005237.4 NA NA GRCh37 2 241987787
## 2: AC061992.1 786 NA GRCh37 17 76425382
## 3: AC097467.2 NA NA GRCh37 4 156294567
## 4: ADAMTS12 NA NA GRCh37 5 33684019
## 5: AL589642.1 54801 NA GRCh37 9 32630154
## End_Position Strand Variant_Classification Variant_Type
## 1: 241987787 + Intron SNP
## 2: 76425382 + 3'Flank SNP
## 3: 156294567 + Intron SNP
## 4: 33684019 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 5: 32630154 + RNA SNP
## Reference_Allele Tumor_Seq_Allele1 Tumor_Seq_Allele2 dbSNP_RS
## 1: C C T NA
## 2: C C T NA
## 3: A A G NA
## 4: A A C NA
## 5: T T C NA
## dbSNP_Val_Status Tumor_Sample_Barcode
## 1: NA SA514619
## 2: NA SA514619
## 3: NA SA514619
## 4: NA SA514619
## 5: NA SA514619
Note that by default Simple Somatic Mutation format contains all affected transcripts of a variant resulting in multiple entries of the same variant in same sample. It is hard to choose a single affected transcript based on annotations alone and by default this program removes repeated variants as duplicated entries. If you wish to keep all of them, set removeDuplicatedVariants
to FALSE. Another option is to convert input file to MAF by removing duplicates and then use scripts like vcf2maf to re-annotate and prioritize affected transcripts.
MutSig/MutSigCV is most widely used program for detecting driver genes 16. However, we have observed that covariates files (gene.covariates.txt and exome_full192.coverage.txt) which are bundled with MutSig have non-standard gene names (non Hugo_Symbols). This discrepancy between Hugo_Symbols in MAF and non-Hugo_symbols in covariates file causes MutSig program to ignore such genes. For example, KMT2D - a well known driver gene in Esophageal Carcinoma is represented as MLL2 in MutSig covariates. This causes KMT2D to be ignored from analysis and is represented as an insignificant gene in MutSig results. This function attempts to correct such gene symbols with a manually curated list of gene names compatible with MutSig covariates list.
We can also subset MAF using function subsetMaf
##Extract data for samples 'TCGA.AB.3009' and 'TCGA.AB.2933' (Printing just 5 rows for display convenience)
subsetMaf(maf = laml, tsb = c('TCGA-AB-3009', 'TCGA-AB-2933'))[1:5]
## Hugo_Symbol Entrez_Gene_Id Center NCBI_Build Chromosome
## 1: ABCB11 8647 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## 2: ACSS3 79611 genome.wustl.edu 37 12
## 3: ANK3 288 genome.wustl.edu 37 10
## 4: AP1G2 8906 genome.wustl.edu 37 14
## 5: ARC 23237 genome.wustl.edu 37 8
## Start_Position End_Position Strand Variant_Classification Variant_Type
## 1: 169780250 169780250 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 2: 81536902 81536902 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 3: 61926581 61926581 + Splice_Site SNP
## 4: 24033309 24033309 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## 5: 143694874 143694874 + Missense_Mutation SNP
## Reference_Allele Tumor_Seq_Allele1 Tumor_Seq_Allele2
## 1: G G A
## 2: C C T
## 3: C C A
## 4: C C T
## 5: C C G
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode Protein_Change i_TumorVAF_WU i_transcript_name
## 1: TCGA-AB-3009 p.A1283V 46.97218 NM_003742.2
## 2: TCGA-AB-3009 p.A266V 47.32510 NM_024560.2
## 3: TCGA-AB-3009 43.99478 NM_020987.2
## 4: TCGA-AB-3009 p.R346Q 47.08000 NM_003917.2
## 5: TCGA-AB-3009 p.W253C 42.96435 NM_015193.3
##Same as above but return output as an MAF object
subsetMaf(maf = laml, tsb = c('TCGA-AB-3009', 'TCGA-AB-2933'), mafObj = TRUE)
## An object of class MAF
## ID summary Mean Median
## 1: NCBI_Build 37 NA NA
## 2: Center genome.wustl.edu NA NA
## 3: Samples 2 NA NA
## 4: nGenes 34 NA NA
## 5: Frame_Shift_Ins 5 2.5 2.5
## 6: In_Frame_Ins 1 0.5 0.5
## 7: Missense_Mutation 26 13.0 13.0
## 8: Nonsense_Mutation 2 1.0 1.0
## 9: Splice_Site 1 0.5 0.5
## 10: total 35 17.5 17.5
##Select all Splice_Site mutations from DNMT3A and NPM1
subsetMaf(maf = laml, genes = c('DNMT3A', 'NPM1'), query = "Variant_Classification == 'Splice_Site'")
## Hugo_Symbol Entrez_Gene_Id Center NCBI_Build Chromosome
## 1: DNMT3A 1788 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## 2: DNMT3A 1788 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## 3: DNMT3A 1788 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## 4: DNMT3A 1788 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## 5: DNMT3A 1788 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## 6: DNMT3A 1788 genome.wustl.edu 37 2
## Start_Position End_Position Strand Variant_Classification Variant_Type
## 1: 25459874 25459874 + Splice_Site SNP
## 2: 25467208 25467208 + Splice_Site SNP
## 3: 25467022 25467022 + Splice_Site SNP
## 4: 25459803 25459803 + Splice_Site SNP
## 5: 25464576 25464576 + Splice_Site SNP
## 6: 25469029 25469029 + Splice_Site SNP
## Reference_Allele Tumor_Seq_Allele1 Tumor_Seq_Allele2
## 1: C C G
## 2: C C T
## 3: A A G
## 4: A A C
## 5: C C A
## 6: C C A
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode Protein_Change i_TumorVAF_WU i_transcript_name
## 1: TCGA-AB-2818 p.R803S 36.84 NM_022552.3
## 2: TCGA-AB-2822 62.96 NM_022552.3
## 3: TCGA-AB-2891 34.78 NM_022552.3
## 4: TCGA-AB-2898 46.43 NM_022552.3
## 5: TCGA-AB-2934 p.G646V 37.50 NM_022552.3
## 6: TCGA-AB-2968 p.E477* 40.00 NM_022552.3
##Same as above but include only 'i_transcript_name' column in the output
subsetMaf(maf = laml, genes = c('DNMT3A', 'NPM1'), query = "Variant_Classification == 'Splice_Site'", fields = 'i_transcript_name')
## Hugo_Symbol Chromosome Start_Position End_Position Reference_Allele
## 1: DNMT3A 2 25459874 25459874 C
## 2: DNMT3A 2 25467208 25467208 C
## 3: DNMT3A 2 25467022 25467022 A
## 4: DNMT3A 2 25459803 25459803 A
## 5: DNMT3A 2 25464576 25464576 C
## 6: DNMT3A 2 25469029 25469029 C
## Tumor_Seq_Allele2 Variant_Classification Variant_Type
## 1: G Splice_Site SNP
## 2: T Splice_Site SNP
## 3: G Splice_Site SNP
## 4: C Splice_Site SNP
## 5: A Splice_Site SNP
## 6: A Splice_Site SNP
## Tumor_Sample_Barcode i_transcript_name
## 1: TCGA-AB-2818 NM_022552.3
## 2: TCGA-AB-2822 NM_022552.3
## 3: TCGA-AB-2891 NM_022552.3
## 4: TCGA-AB-2898 NM_022552.3
## 5: TCGA-AB-2934 NM_022552.3
## 6: TCGA-AB-2968 NM_022552.3
There is also an R data package containing pre-compiled TCGA MAF objects, particularly helpful for those working with TCGA mutation data. Every dataset is stored as an MAF object containing somatic mutations along with clinical information. Due to Bioconductor package size limits and other difficulties, this was not submitted to Bioconductor. However, you can still download TCGAmutations package from GitHub.
## R version 3.4.4 (2018-03-15)
## Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
## Running under: Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
##
## Matrix products: default
## BLAS: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.6-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.so
## LAPACK: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.6-bioc/R/lib/libRlapack.so
##
## locale:
## [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
## [3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=C
## [5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
## [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
## [9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
## [11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
##
## attached base packages:
## [1] parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods
## [8] base
##
## other attached packages:
## [1] ggfortify_0.4.3 ggplot2_2.2.1 pheatmap_1.0.8
## [4] maftools_1.4.28 bigmemory_4.5.33 Biobase_2.38.0
## [7] BiocGenerics_0.24.0
##
## loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
## [1] bitops_1.0-6 matrixStats_0.53.1
## [3] bit64_0.9-7 doParallel_1.0.11
## [5] RColorBrewer_1.1-2 progress_1.1.2
## [7] httr_1.3.1 rprojroot_1.3-2
## [9] GenomeInfoDb_1.14.0 tools_3.4.4
## [11] backports_1.1.2 R6_2.2.2
## [13] DBI_0.8 lazyeval_0.2.1
## [15] colorspace_1.3-2 GetoptLong_0.1.6
## [17] gridExtra_2.3 prettyunits_1.0.2
## [19] RMySQL_0.10.14 bit_1.1-12
## [21] compiler_3.4.4 DelayedArray_0.4.1
## [23] pkgmaker_0.22 labeling_0.3
## [25] slam_0.1-42 rtracklayer_1.38.3
## [27] scales_0.5.0 NMF_0.21.0
## [29] stringr_1.3.0 digest_0.6.15
## [31] Rsamtools_1.30.0 rmarkdown_1.9
## [33] cometExactTest_0.1.5 XVector_0.18.0
## [35] pkgconfig_2.0.1 htmltools_0.3.6
## [37] changepoint_2.2.2 BSgenome_1.46.0
## [39] rlang_0.2.0 GlobalOptions_0.0.13
## [41] RSQLite_2.1.0 bindr_0.1.1
## [43] shape_1.4.4 zoo_1.8-1
## [45] mclust_5.4 BiocParallel_1.12.0
## [47] dplyr_0.7.4 VariantAnnotation_1.24.5
## [49] RCurl_1.95-4.10 magrittr_1.5
## [51] GenomeInfoDbData_1.0.0 wordcloud_2.5
## [53] Matrix_1.2-14 Rcpp_0.12.16
## [55] munsell_0.4.3 S4Vectors_0.16.0
## [57] stringi_1.1.7 yaml_2.1.18
## [59] SummarizedExperiment_1.8.1 zlibbioc_1.24.0
## [61] plyr_1.8.4 grid_3.4.4
## [63] blob_1.1.1 ggrepel_0.7.0
## [65] bigmemory.sri_0.1.3 lattice_0.20-35
## [67] Biostrings_2.46.0 cowplot_0.9.2
## [69] splines_3.4.4 GenomicFeatures_1.30.3
## [71] circlize_0.4.3 knitr_1.20
## [73] ComplexHeatmap_1.17.1 pillar_1.2.1
## [75] GenomicRanges_1.30.3 rjson_0.2.15
## [77] rngtools_1.2.4 reshape2_1.4.3
## [79] codetools_0.2-15 biomaRt_2.34.2
## [81] stats4_3.4.4 glue_1.2.0
## [83] XML_3.98-1.10 evaluate_0.10.1
## [85] data.table_1.10.4-3 foreach_1.4.4
## [87] purrr_0.2.4 tidyr_0.8.0
## [89] gtable_0.2.0 assertthat_0.2.0
## [91] gridBase_0.4-7 xtable_1.8-2
## [93] survival_2.41-3 tibble_1.4.2
## [95] iterators_1.0.9 GenomicAlignments_1.14.2
## [97] AnnotationDbi_1.40.0 registry_0.5
## [99] memoise_1.1.0 IRanges_2.12.0
## [101] bindrcpp_0.2.2 cluster_2.0.7-1
If you have any issues, bug reports or feature requests please feel free to raise an issue on GitHub page.
somaticInteractions
plot is inspired from the article Combining gene mutation with gene expression data improves outcome prediction in myelodysplastic syndromes. Thanks to authors for making source code available.