MethReg: estimating regulatory potential of DNA methylation in gene transcription
27 October 2020
Package
MethReg 1.0.0
Contents
1 Introduction
Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that facilitate the transcription of DNA into RNA. A number of recent studies have observed that the binding of TFs onto DNA can be affected by DNA methylation, and in turn, DNA methylation can also be added or removed by proteins associated with transcription factors (Bonder et al. 2017; Banovich et al. 2014; Zhu, Wang, and Qian 2016).
To provide functional annotations for differentially methylated regions (DMRs)
and differentially methylated CpG sites (DMS), MethReg performs integrative
analyses using matched DNA methylation and gene expression along with
Transcription Factor Binding Sites (TFBS) data. MethReg evaluates, prioritizes
and annotates DNA methylation regions (or sites) with high regulatory potential
that works synergistically with TFs to regulate target gene expressions,
without any additional ChIP-seq data.
The results from MethReg can be used to generate testable hypothesis on the
synergistic collaboration of DNA methylation changes and TFs in gene regulation.
MethReg can be used either to evaluate regulatory potentials of candidate
regions or to search for methylation coupled TF regulatory processes in the entire genome.
2 Installation
MethReg is a Bioconductor package and can be installed through BiocManager::install().
if (!"BiocManager" %in% rownames(installed.packages()))
install.packages("BiocManager")
BiocManager::install("MethReg", dependencies = TRUE)After the package is installed, it can be loaded into R workspace by
library(MethReg)3 MethReg workflow
The figure below illustrates the workflow for MethReg. Given matched array DNA methylation data and RNA-seq gene expression data, MethReg additionally incorporates TF binding information from ReMap2020 (Chèneby et al. 2019) or the JASPAR2020 (Baranasic 2020; Fornes et al. 2020) database, and optionally additional TF-target gene interaction databases, to perform both promoter and distal (enhancer) analysis.
In the unsupervised mode, MethReg analyzes all CpGs on the Illumina arrays. In the supervised mode, MethReg analyzes and prioritizes differentially methylated CpGs identified in EWAS.
There are three main steps: (1) create a dataset with triplets of CpGs, TFs that bind near the CpGs, and putative target genes, (2) for each triplet (CpG, TF, target gene), apply integrative statistical models to DNA methylation, target gene expression, and TF expression values, and (3) visualize and interpret results from statistical models to estimate individual and joint impacts of DNA methylation and TF on target gene expression, as well as annotate the roles of TF and CpG methylation in each triplet.
The results from the statistical models will also allow us to identify a list of CpGs that work synergistically with TFs to influence target gene expression.
Figure 1: MethReg workflow
4 Analysis illustration
4.1 Input data
For illustration, we will use chromosome 21 data from 38 TCGA-COAD (colon cancer) samples.
4.1.1 Input DNA methylation dataset
The DNA methylation dataset is a matrix or SummarizedExperiment object with methylation beta or M-values. If there are potential confounding factors (e.g. batch effect, age, sex) in the dataset, this matrix would contain residuals from fitting linear regression instead (see details Section 5 “Controlling effects from confounding variables” below).
The samples are in the columns and methylation regions or probes are in the rows.
4.1.1.1 Analysis for individual CpGs data
We will analyze all CpGs on chromosome 21 in this vignette.
However, oftentimes, the methylation data can also be, for example, differentially methylated sites (DMS) or differentially methylated regions (DMRs) obtained in an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) study.
data("dna.met.chr21")dna.met.chr21[1:5,1:5]
#> TCGA-3L-AA1B-01A TCGA-4N-A93T-01A TCGA-4T-AA8H-01A TCGA-5M-AAT4-01A TCGA-5M-AAT5-01A
#> cg00002080 0.6454046 0.5933725 0.54955509 0.81987982 0.79171160
#> cg00004533 0.9655396 0.9640490 0.96690671 0.95510446 0.96061252
#> cg00009944 0.5437705 0.2803064 0.42918909 0.60734630 0.47555585
#> cg00025591 0.4021317 0.7953653 0.41816364 0.33241304 0.67251468
#> cg00026030 0.1114705 0.1012902 0.06834467 0.08594876 0.06715677We will first create a SummarizedExperiment object with the function
make_dnam_se. This function will use the Sesame R/Bioconductor package
to map the array probes into genomic regions. You cen set human genome version
(hg38 or hg19) and the array type (“450k” or “EPIC”)
dna.met.chr21.se <- make_dnam_se(
dnam = dna.met.chr21,
genome = "hg38",
arrayType = "450k",
betaToM = FALSE, # transform beta to m-values
verbose = FALSE # hide informative messages
)dna.met.chr21.se
#> class: RangedSummarizedExperiment
#> dim: 2918 38
#> metadata(2): genome arrayType
#> assays(1): ''
#> rownames(2918): chr21:10450634-10450635 chr21:10520974-10520975 ...
#> chr21:46670216-46670217 chr21:46670596-46670597
#> rowData names(53): address_A address_B ... MASK_general probeID
#> colnames(38): TCGA-3L-AA1B-01A TCGA-4N-A93T-01A ... TCGA-A6-5656-01B TCGA-A6-5657-01A
#> colData names(1): samplesSummarizedExperiment::rowRanges(dna.met.chr21.se)[1:4,1:4]
#> GRanges object with 4 ranges and 4 metadata columns:
#> seqnames ranges strand | address_A address_B channel
#> <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <integer> <integer> <character>
#> chr21:10450634-10450635 chr21 10450634-10450635 * | 74716393 <NA> Both
#> chr21:10520974-10520975 chr21 10520974-10520975 * | 29756401 20622400 Red
#> chr21:10521044-10521045 chr21 10521044-10521045 * | 15617483 <NA> Both
#> chr21:10521122-10521123 chr21 10521122-10521123 * | 33810384 37781360 Grn
#> designType
#> <character>
#> chr21:10450634-10450635 II
#> chr21:10520974-10520975 I
#> chr21:10521044-10521045 II
#> chr21:10521122-10521123 I
#> -------
#> seqinfo: 26 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths4.1.1.2 Analysis of DMRs
Differentially Methylated Regions (DMRs) associated with phenotypes such
as tumor stage can be obtained from R packages such as
coMethDMR, comb-p, DMRcate and many others.
The methylation levels in multiple CpGs within the DMRs need to be
summarized (e.g. using medians), then the analysis for
DMR will proceed in the same way
as those for CpGs.
4.1.2 Input gene expression dataset
The gene expression dataset is a matrix with log2 transformed and normalized gene expression values. If there are potential confounding factors (e.g. batch effect, age, sex) in the dataset, this matrix can also contain residuals from linear regression instead (see Section 6 “Controlling effects from confounding variables” below).
The samples are in the columns and the genes are in the rows.
data("gene.exp.chr21.log2")
gene.exp.chr21.log2[1:5,1:5]
#> TCGA-3L-AA1B-01A TCGA-4N-A93T-01A TCGA-4T-AA8H-01A TCGA-5M-AAT4-01A
#> ENSG00000141956 14.64438 14.65342 14.09232 14.60680
#> ENSG00000141959 19.33519 20.03720 19.76128 19.57854
#> ENSG00000142149 17.27832 16.02392 18.16079 15.84463
#> ENSG00000142156 20.38689 18.83080 18.02720 18.91380
#> ENSG00000142166 17.89172 18.06625 18.47187 17.40467
#> TCGA-5M-AAT5-01A
#> ENSG00000141956 14.58640
#> ENSG00000141959 18.27442
#> ENSG00000142149 14.79654
#> ENSG00000142156 18.71926
#> ENSG00000142166 16.71412We will also create a SummarizedExperiment object for the gene expression data. This object will contain the genomic information for each gene.
gene.exp.chr21.se <- make_exp_se(
exp = gene.exp.chr21.log2,
genome = "hg38",
verbose = FALSE
)
gene.exp.chr21.se
#> class: RangedSummarizedExperiment
#> dim: 752 38
#> metadata(1): genome
#> assays(1): ''
#> rownames(752): ENSG00000141956 ENSG00000141959 ... ENSG00000281420 ENSG00000281903
#> rowData names(2): ensembl_gene_id external_gene_name
#> colnames(38): TCGA-3L-AA1B-01A TCGA-4N-A93T-01A ... TCGA-A6-5656-01B TCGA-A6-5657-01A
#> colData names(1): samplesSummarizedExperiment::rowRanges(gene.exp.chr21.se)[1:5,]
#> GRanges object with 5 ranges and 2 metadata columns:
#> seqnames ranges strand | ensembl_gene_id external_gene_name
#> <Rle> <IRanges> <Rle> | <character> <character>
#> ENSG00000141956 chr21 41798225-41879482 - | ENSG00000141956 PRDM15
#> ENSG00000141959 chr21 44300051-44327376 + | ENSG00000141959 PFKL
#> ENSG00000142149 chr21 31873020-32044633 + | ENSG00000142149 HUNK
#> ENSG00000142156 chr21 45981769-46005050 + | ENSG00000142156 COL6A1
#> ENSG00000142166 chr21 33324429-33359864 + | ENSG00000142166 IFNAR1
#> -------
#> seqinfo: 24 sequences from an unspecified genome; no seqlengths4.1.3 Creating triplet dataset
4.1.3.1 Creating triplet dataset using distance based approaches and JASPAR2020
In this section, regions refer to the regions where CpGs are located.
The function create_triplet_distance_based provides three different methods to
link a region to a target gene:
- Mapping the region to the closest gene (
target.method = "genes.promoter.overlap") - Mapping the region to a specific number of genes upstream down/upstream
of the region (
target.method = "nearby.genes") (Silva et al. 2019). - Mapping the region to all the genes within a window
(default size = 500 kbp around the region, i.e. +- 250 kbp from start or end
of the region) (
target.method = "window") (Reese et al. 2019).
Figure 2: Different target linking strategies
For the analysis of probes in gene promoter region, we recommend setting
method = "genes.promoter.overlap", or
method = "closest.gene".
For the analysis of probes in distal regions, we recommend setting either
method = "window" or method = "nearby.genes".
Note that the distal analysis will be more time and resource consuming.
To link regions to TF using JASPAR2020, MethReg uses motifmatchr (Schep 2020) to scan
these regions for occurrences of motifs in the database. JASPAR2020 is an
open-access database of curated, non-redundant transcription
factor (TF)-binding profiles (Baranasic 2020; Fornes et al. 2020), which contains
more the 500 human TF motifs.
The argument motif.search.window.size will be used to extend the region when scanning
for the motifs, for example, a motif.search.window.size of 50 will add 25 bp
upstream and 25 bp downstream of the original region.
As an example, the following scripts link CpGs with the probes in gene promoter region (method 1. above)
triplet.promoter <- create_triplet_distance_based(
region = dna.met.chr21.se,
target.method = "genes.promoter.overlap",
genome = "hg38",
target.promoter.upstream.dist.tss = 2000,
target.promoter.downstream.dist.tss = 2000,
motif.search.window.size = 500,
motif.search.p.cutoff = 1e-08,
cores = 1
)Alternatively, we can also link each probe with genes within \(500 kb\) window (method 2).
# Map probes to genes within 500kb window
triplet.distal.window <- create_triplet_distance_based(
region = dna.met.chr21.se,
genome = "hg38",
target.method = "window",
target.window.size = 500 * 10^3,
target.rm.promoter.regions.from.distal.linking = TRUE,
motif.search.window.size = 500,
motif.search.p.cutoff = 1e-08,
cores = 1
)For method 3, to map probes to 5 nearest upstream and downstream genes:
# Map probes to 5 genes upstream and 5 downstream
triplet.distal.nearby.genes <- create_triplet_distance_based(
region = dna.met.chr21.se,
genome = "hg38",
target.method = "nearby.genes",
target.num.flanking.genes = 5,
target.window.size = 500 * 10^3,
target.rm.promoter.regions.from.distal.linking = TRUE,
motif.search.window.size = 500,
motif.search.p.cutoff = 1e-08,
cores = 1
)4.1.3.2 Creating triplet dataset using distance based approaches and REMAP2020
Instead of using JASPAR2020 motifs, we will be using REMAP2020 catalogue of
TF peaks which can be access using the package ReMapEnrich.
if (!"BiocManager" %in% rownames(installed.packages()))
install.packages("BiocManager")
BiocManager::install("remap-cisreg/ReMapEnrich", dependencies = TRUE)To download REMAP2020 catalogue (~1Gb) the following functions are used:
library(ReMapEnrich)
remapCatalog2018hg38 <- downloadRemapCatalog("/tmp/", assembly = "hg38")
remapCatalog <- bedToGranges(remapCatalog2018hg38)The function create_triplet_distance_based will accept any Granges with TF
information in the same format as the remapCatalog one.
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Triplets promoter using remap
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
triplet.promoter.remap <- create_triplet_distance_based(
region = dna.met.chr21.se,
genome = "hg19",
target.method = "genes.promoter.overlap",
TF.peaks.gr = remapCatalog,
motif.search.window.size = 500,
max.distance.region.target = 10^6,
) 4.1.3.3 Creating triplet dataset using regulon-based approaches
The human regulons from the dorothea database will be used as an example:
if (!"BiocManager" %in% rownames(installed.packages()))
install.packages("BiocManager")
BiocManager::install("dorothea", dependencies = TRUE)regulons.dorothea <- dorothea::dorothea_hs
regulons.dorothea %>% head
#> # A tibble: 6 x 4
#> tf confidence target mor
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 ADNP D ATF7IP 1
#> 2 ADNP D DYRK1A 1
#> 3 ADNP D TLK1 1
#> 4 ADNP D ZMYM4 1
#> 5 ADNP D ABCC1 1
#> 6 ADNP D ABCC6 1Using the regulons, you can calculate enrichment scores for each TF across all samples using dorothea and viper.
rnaseq.tf.es <- get_tf_ES(
exp = gene.exp.chr21.se %>% SummarizedExperiment::assay(),
regulons = regulons.dorothea
)Finally, triplets can be identified using TF-target from regulon databases with the function create_triplet_regulon_based.
triplet.regulon <- create_triplet_regulon_based(
region = dna.met.chr21.se,
genome = "hg38",
motif.search.window.size = 500,
tf.target = regulons.dorothea,
max.distance.region.target = 10^6 # 1Mbp
) triplet.regulon %>% head
#> # A tibble: 6 x 7
#> regionID target_symbol target TF_symbol TF confidence distance_region_targ…
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 chr21:29073653-2… CCT8 ENSG0000015… ALX3 ENSG00000… E 142
#> 2 chr21:29073731-2… CCT8 ENSG0000015… ALX3 ENSG00000… E 64
#> 3 chr21:29073853-2… CCT8 ENSG0000015… ALX3 ENSG00000… E -55
#> 4 chr21:29073902-2… CCT8 ENSG0000015… ALX3 ENSG00000… E -104
#> 5 chr21:29073917-2… CCT8 ENSG0000015… ALX3 ENSG00000… E -119
#> 6 chr21:29073920-2… CCT8 ENSG0000015… ALX3 ENSG00000… E -1224.1.3.4 Example of triplet data frame
The triplet is a data frame with the following columns:
target: gene identifier (obtained from row names of the gene expression matrix),regionID: region/CpG identifier (obtained from row names of the DNA methylation matrix)TF: gene identifier (obtained from the row names of the gene expression matrix)
str(triplet.promoter)
#> tibble [3,707 × 7] (S3: tbl_df/tbl/data.frame)
#> $ regionID : chr [1:3707] "chr21:10521553-10521554" "chr21:10521553-10521554" "chr21:10521553-10521554" "chr21:14063939-14063940" ...
#> $ probeID : chr [1:3707] "cg05437132" "cg05437132" "cg05437132" "cg25507885" ...
#> $ target_symbol : chr [1:3707] "TPTE" "TPTE" "TPTE" "ANKRD20A18P" ...
#> $ target : chr [1:3707] "ENSG00000274391" "ENSG00000274391" "ENSG00000274391" "ENSG00000249493" ...
#> $ TF_symbol : chr [1:3707] "KLF5" "TFE3" "KLF15" "THAP1" ...
#> $ TF : chr [1:3707] "ENSG00000102554" "ENSG00000068323" "ENSG00000163884" "ENSG00000131931" ...
#> $ distance_region_target_tss: num [1:3707] 0 0 0 -384 -83 ...triplet.promoter$distance_region_target_tss %>% range
#> [1] -1999 1989triplet.promoter %>% head
#> # A tibble: 6 x 7
#> regionID probeID target_symbol target TF_symbol TF distance_region_targ…
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 chr21:10521553-1… cg054371… TPTE ENSG0000027… KLF5 ENSG000001… 0
#> 2 chr21:10521553-1… cg054371… TPTE ENSG0000027… TFE3 ENSG000000… 0
#> 3 chr21:10521553-1… cg054371… TPTE ENSG0000027… KLF15 ENSG000001… 0
#> 4 chr21:14063939-1… cg255078… ANKRD20A18P ENSG0000024… THAP1 ENSG000001… -384
#> 5 chr21:14070786-1… cg160385… RNA5SP488 ENSG0000020… ZNF354C ENSG000001… -83
#> 6 chr21:14071916-1… cg248036… RNA5SP488 ENSG0000020… ZNF354C ENSG000001… 1044Note that there may be multiple rows for a CpG region, when multiple target gene and/or TFs are found close to it.
4.2 Evaluating the regulatory potential of CpGs (or DMRs)
Because TF binding to DNA can be influenced by (or influences) DNA methylation levels nearby (Yin et al. 2017), target gene expression levels are often resulted from the synergistic effects of both TF and DNA methylation. In other words, TF activities in gene regulation is often affected by DNA methylation.
Our goal then is to highlight DNA methylation regions (or CpGs) where these synergistic DNAm and TF collaborations occur. We will perform analyses using the 3 datasets described above in Section 3:
- An input DNA methylation matrix
- An input Gene expression matrix
- The created triplet data frame
4.2.1 Analysis using model with methylation by TF interaction
The function interaction_model assess the regulatory impact of
DNA methylation on TF regulation of target genes via the following approach:
considering DNAm values as a binary variable - we define a binary variable
DNAm Group for DNA methylation values (high = 1, low = 0).
That is, samples with the highest DNAm levels (top 25 percent) has high = 1,
samples with lowest DNAm levels (bottom 25 pecent) has high = 0.
Note that in this implementation, only samples with DNAm values in the first and last quartiles are considered.
\[log_2(RNA target) \sim log_2(TF) + \text{DNAm Group} + log_2(TF) * \text{DNAm Group}\]
results.interaction.model <- interaction_model(
triplet = triplet.promoter,
dnam = dna.met.chr21.se,
exp = gene.exp.chr21.se,
sig.threshold = 0.05,
fdr = TRUE,
filter.correlated.tf.exp.dnam = TRUE,
filter.triplet.by.sig.term = TRUE
)The output of interaction_model function will be a data frame with the following variables:
pval_<variable>: p-value for a tested variable (methylation or TF), given the other variables included in the model.estimate_<variable>: estimated effect for a variable. If estimate > 0, increasing values of the variable corresponds to increased outcome values (target gene expression). If estimate < 0, increasing values of the variable correspond to decreased target gene expression levels.
The following columns are provided for the results of fitting quartile model to triplet data:
- direct effect of methylation:
quant_pval_metGrp: p-value for binary DNA methylation variablequant_estimates_metGrp: estimated DNA methylation effect
- direct effect of TF:
quant_pval_rna.tf: p-value for TF expressionquant_estimates_rna.tf: estimated TF effect
- synergistic effects of methylation and TF:
quant_pval_metGrp:rna.tf: : p-value for DNA methylation by TF interactionquant_estimates_metGrp:rna.tf: estimated DNA methylation by TF interaction effect
# Results for quartile model
results.interaction.model %>% dplyr::select(
c(1,4,5,grep("quant",colnames(results.interaction.model)))
) %>% head
#> regionID target TF_symbol quant_pval_metGrp quant_fdr_metGrp
#> 1 chr21:46286307-46286308 ENSG00000160294 ETS2 0.02067404 0.04134809
#> quant_pval_rna.tf quant_fdr_rna.tf quant_pval_metGrp:rna.tf quant_fdr_metGrp:rna.tf
#> 1 0.4408366 0.8816731 0.02117496 0.04234992
#> quant_estimate_metGrp quant_estimate_rna.tf quant_estimate_metGrp:rna.tf Model.quantile
#> 1 -9.86789 0.0972241 0.4669152 Robust Linear Model4.2.2 Stratified analysis by high and low DNA methylation levels
For triplets with significant \(log_2(TF) × DNAm\) interaction effect identified
above, we can further assess how gene regulation by TF changes when DNAm
is high or low. To this end, the function
stratified_model fits two separate models (see below) to only
samples with the highest DNAm levels (top 25 percent), and then to
only samples with lowest DNAm levels (bottom 25 percent), separately.
\[\text{Stratified Model: } log_2(RNA target) \sim log_2(TF)\]
results.stratified.model <- stratified_model(
triplet = results.interaction.model,
dnam = dna.met.chr21.se,
exp = gene.exp.chr21.se
)results.stratified.model %>% head
#> regionID probeID target_symbol target TF_symbol TF
#> 1 chr21:46286307-46286308 cg02878701 MCM3AP ENSG00000160294 ETS2 ENSG00000157557
#> distance_region_target_tss met.IQR quant_pval_metGrp quant_fdr_metGrp quant_pval_rna.tf
#> 1 -9 0.01917604 0.02067404 0.04134809 0.4408366
#> quant_fdr_rna.tf quant_pval_metGrp:rna.tf quant_fdr_metGrp:rna.tf quant_estimate_metGrp
#> 1 0.8816731 0.02117496 0.04234992 -9.86789
#> quant_estimate_rna.tf quant_estimate_metGrp:rna.tf Model.quantile
#> 1 0.0972241 0.4669152 Robust Linear Model
#> Wilcoxon_pval_target_q4met_vs_q1met Wilcoxon_pval_tf_q4met_vs_q1met
#> 1 0.7913368 0.96985
#> % of 0 target genes (Q1 and Q4) DNAmlow_pval_rna.tf DNAmlow_estimate_rna.tf DNAmhigh_pval_rna.tf
#> 1 0 % 0.4631124 0.1106484 8.779142e-05
#> DNAmhigh_estimate_rna.tf DNAm.effect TF.role
#> 1 0.5621311 Enhancing Activator4.2.3 Visualization of data
The functions plot_interaction_model
will create figures to visualize the data,
in a way that corresponds to the linear model we considered above.
It requires the output from the function interaction_model (a dataframe),
the DNA methylation matrix and the gene expression matrix as input.
plots <- plot_interaction_model(
triplet.results = results.interaction.model[1,],
dnam = dna.met.chr21.se,
exp = gene.exp.chr21.se
)plots
#> $`chr21:46286307-46286308_TF_ENSG00000157557_target_ENSG00000160294`
Figure 3: An example output from MethReg
The first row of the figures shows pairwise associations between DNA methylation, TF and target gene expression levels.
The second row of the figures show how much TF activity on target gene expression levels vary by DNA methylation levels. When TF by methylation interaction is significant (Section 4.1), we expect the association between TF and target gene expression vary depending on whether DNA methylation is low or high.
In this example, when DNA methylation is low, target gene expression is relatively independent of the amount of TF available. On the other hand, when DNA methylation level is high, more abundant TF corresponds to increased gene expression (an activator TF). One possibility is that DNA methylation might enhance TF binding in this case. This is an example where DNA methylation and TF work synergistically to affect target gene expression.
While the main goal of MethReg is to prioritize methylation CpGs, also note that without stratifying by DNA methylation, the overall TF-target effects (p = 0.142) is not as significant as the association in stratified analysis in high methylation samples (p = 0.00508). This demonstrates that by additionally modeling DNA methylation, we can also nominate TF – target associations that might have been missed otherwise.
4.3 Results interpretation
Shown below are some expected results from fitting Models 1 & 2 described in Section 4.1 above, depending on TF binding preferences. Please note that there can be more possible scenarios than those listed here, therefore, careful evaluation of the statistical models and visualization of data as described in Section 4 are needed to gain a good understanding of the multi-omics data.
Figure 4: Scenarios modeled by MethReg
5 Controlling effects from confounding variables
Both gene expressions and DNA methylation levels can be affected by age, sex,
shifting in cell types, batch effects and other confounding (or covariate) variables.
In this section, we illustrate analysis workflow that reduces confounding effects,
by first extracting the residual data with the function get_residuals,
before fitting the models discussed above in Section 4.
The get_residuals function will use gene expression (or DNA methylation data)
and phenotype data as input. To remove confounding effects in gene expression data,
we use the get_residuals function which extract residuals after fitting the
following model for gene expression data:
\[log_2(RNA target) \sim covariate_{1} + covariate_{2} + ... + covariate_{N}\]
or the following model for methylation data:
\[methylation.Mvalues \sim covariate_{1} + covariate_{2} + ... + covariate_{N}\]
data("gene.exp.chr21.log2")
data("clinical")
metadata <- clinical[,c("sample_type","gender")]
gene.exp.chr21.residuals <- get_residuals(gene.exp.chr21, metadata) %>% as.matrix()gene.exp.chr21.residuals[1:5,1:5]data("dna.met.chr21")
dna.met.chr21 <- make_se_from_dnam_probes(
dnam = dna.met.chr21,
genome = "hg38",
arrayType = "450k",
betaToM = TRUE
)
dna.met.chr21.residuals <- get_residuals(dna.met.chr21, metadata) %>% as.matrix()dna.met.chr21.residuals[1:5,1:5]The models described in Section 4.1 can then be applied to these residuals
data using the interaction_model function:
results <- interaction_model(
triplet = triplet,
dnam = dna.met.chr21.residuals,
exp = gene.exp.chr21.residuals
)6 Calculating enrichment scores
6.1 Using dorothea and viper
This example shows how to use dorothea regulons and viper to calculate enrichment scores for each TF across all samples.
regulons.dorothea <- dorothea::dorothea_hs
regulons.dorothea %>% head
#> # A tibble: 6 x 4
#> tf confidence target mor
#> <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl>
#> 1 ADNP D ATF7IP 1
#> 2 ADNP D DYRK1A 1
#> 3 ADNP D TLK1 1
#> 4 ADNP D ZMYM4 1
#> 5 ADNP D ABCC1 1
#> 6 ADNP D ABCC6 1rnaseq.tf.es <- get_tf_ES(
exp = gene.exp.chr21.se %>% SummarizedExperiment::assay(),
regulons = regulons.dorothea
)rnaseq.tf.es[1:4,1:4]
#> TCGA-3L-AA1B-01A TCGA-4N-A93T-01A TCGA-4T-AA8H-01A TCGA-5M-AAT4-01A
#> ENSG00000101126 0.5107344 -2.1708007 -1.4257370 -2.29950338
#> ENSG00000101544 -1.0332572 -0.2855890 0.8007206 0.14008977
#> ENSG00000139154 -0.9773648 0.2275618 0.9888562 -2.01317607
#> ENSG00000160224 0.2112202 -0.9044230 0.1509887 -0.017175186.2 Using dorothea and GSVA
regulons.dorothea <- dorothea::dorothea_hs
regulons.dorothea$tf <- MethReg:::map_symbol_to_ensg(
gene.symbol = regulons.dorothea$tf,
genome = "hg38"
)
regulons.dorothea$target <- MethReg:::map_symbol_to_ensg(
gene.symbol = regulons.dorothea$target,
genome = "hg38"
)
split_tibble <- function(tibble, col = 'col') tibble %>% split(., .[, col])
regulons.dorothea.list <- regulons.dorothea %>% na.omit() %>%
split_tibble('tf') %>%
lapply(function(x){x[[3]]})library(GSVA)
rnaseq.tf.es.gsva <- gsva(
expr = gene.exp.chr21.se %>% SummarizedExperiment::assay(),
gset.idx.list = regulons.dorothea.list,
method = "gsva",
kcdf = "Gaussian",
abs.ranking = TRUE,
min.sz = 5,
max.sz = Inf,
parallel.sz = 1L,
mx.diff = TRUE,
ssgsea.norm = TRUE,
verbose = TRUE
)7 Session information
sessionInfo()
#> R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)
#> Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit)
#> Running under: Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
#>
#> Matrix products: default
#> BLAS: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.12-bioc/R/lib/libRblas.so
#> LAPACK: /home/biocbuild/bbs-3.12-bioc/R/lib/libRlapack.so
#>
#> locale:
#> [1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8
#> [4] LC_COLLATE=C LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
#> [7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C LC_ADDRESS=C
#> [10] LC_TELEPHONE=C LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
#>
#> attached base packages:
#> [1] stats4 parallel stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base
#>
#> other attached packages:
#> [1] BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg38_1.4.3 BSgenome_1.58.0
#> [3] rtracklayer_1.50.0 Biostrings_2.58.0
#> [5] XVector_0.30.0 GenomicRanges_1.42.0
#> [7] GenomeInfoDb_1.26.0 IRanges_2.24.0
#> [9] S4Vectors_0.28.0 MethReg_1.0.0
#> [11] sesameData_1.7.6 ExperimentHub_1.16.0
#> [13] AnnotationHub_2.22.0 BiocFileCache_1.14.0
#> [15] dbplyr_1.4.4 BiocGenerics_0.36.0
#> [17] dplyr_1.0.2 BiocStyle_2.18.0
#>
#> loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
#> [1] utf8_1.1.4 R.utils_2.10.1 tidyselect_1.1.0
#> [4] poweRlaw_0.70.6 RSQLite_2.2.1 AnnotationDbi_1.52.0
#> [7] grid_4.0.3 BiocParallel_1.24.0 munsell_0.5.0
#> [10] codetools_0.2-16 preprocessCore_1.52.0 withr_2.3.0
#> [13] colorspace_1.4-1 Biobase_2.50.0 highr_0.8
#> [16] knitr_1.30 pscl_1.5.5 ggsignif_0.6.0
#> [19] MatrixGenerics_1.2.0 labeling_0.4.2 GenomeInfoDbData_1.2.4
#> [22] bit64_4.0.5 farver_2.0.3 rhdf5_2.34.0
#> [25] vctrs_0.3.4 generics_0.0.2 xfun_0.18
#> [28] randomForest_4.6-14 R6_2.4.1 doParallel_1.0.16
#> [31] bitops_1.0-6 rhdf5filters_1.2.0 DelayedArray_0.16.0
#> [34] assertthat_0.2.1 promises_1.1.1 scales_1.1.1
#> [37] gtable_0.3.0 wheatmap_0.1.0 seqLogo_1.56.0
#> [40] rlang_0.4.8 splines_4.0.3 rstatix_0.6.0
#> [43] broom_0.7.2 BiocManager_1.30.10 yaml_2.2.1
#> [46] reshape2_1.4.4 abind_1.4-5 backports_1.1.10
#> [49] httpuv_1.5.4 tools_4.0.3 bookdown_0.21
#> [52] ggplot2_3.3.2 ellipsis_0.3.1 RColorBrewer_1.1-2
#> [55] DNAcopy_1.64.0 Rcpp_1.0.5 plyr_1.8.6
#> [58] progress_1.2.2 zlibbioc_1.36.0 purrr_0.3.4
#> [61] RCurl_1.98-1.2 prettyunits_1.1.1 ggpubr_0.4.0
#> [64] cowplot_1.1.0 sfsmisc_1.1-7 SummarizedExperiment_1.20.0
#> [67] haven_2.3.1 motifmatchr_1.12.0 magrittr_1.5
#> [70] data.table_1.13.2 magick_2.5.0 openxlsx_4.2.3
#> [73] matrixStats_0.57.0 hms_0.5.3 mime_0.9
#> [76] evaluate_0.14 xtable_1.8-4 XML_3.99-0.5
#> [79] rio_0.5.16 jpeg_0.1-8.1 readxl_1.3.1
#> [82] gridExtra_2.3 compiler_4.0.3 tibble_3.0.4
#> [85] KernSmooth_2.23-17 crayon_1.3.4 R.oo_1.24.0
#> [88] htmltools_0.5.0 segmented_1.3-0 mgcv_1.8-33
#> [91] later_1.1.0.1 TFBSTools_1.28.0 tidyr_1.1.2
#> [94] DBI_1.1.0 MASS_7.3-53 rappdirs_0.3.1
#> [97] Matrix_1.2-18 bcellViper_1.25.0 car_3.0-10
#> [100] readr_1.4.0 cli_2.1.0 R.methodsS3_1.8.1
#> [103] forcats_0.5.0 pkgconfig_2.0.3 sesame_1.8.0
#> [106] GenomicAlignments_1.26.0 TFMPvalue_0.0.8 foreign_0.8-80
#> [109] dorothea_1.1.2 foreach_1.5.1 annotate_1.68.0
#> [112] DirichletMultinomial_1.32.0 JASPAR2020_0.99.10 viper_1.24.0
#> [115] stringr_1.4.0 digest_0.6.27 pracma_2.2.9
#> [118] CNEr_1.26.0 rmarkdown_2.5 cellranger_1.1.0
#> [121] curl_4.3 kernlab_0.9-29 shiny_1.5.0
#> [124] Rsamtools_2.6.0 gtools_3.8.2 lifecycle_0.2.0
#> [127] nlme_3.1-150 Rhdf5lib_1.12.0 carData_3.0-4
#> [130] fansi_0.4.1 pillar_1.4.6 lattice_0.20-41
#> [133] KEGGREST_1.30.0 fastmap_1.0.1 httr_1.4.2
#> [136] survival_3.2-7 GO.db_3.12.0 interactiveDisplayBase_1.28.0
#> [139] glue_1.4.2 zip_2.1.1 png_0.1-7
#> [142] iterators_1.0.13 BiocVersion_3.12.0 bit_4.0.4
#> [145] class_7.3-17 stringi_1.5.3 HDF5Array_1.18.0
#> [148] mixtools_1.2.0 blob_1.2.1 caTools_1.18.0
#> [151] memoise_1.1.0 e1071_1.7-4Bibliography
Banovich, Nicholas E, Xun Lan, Graham McVicker, Bryce Van de Geijn, Jacob F Degner, John D Blischak, Julien Roux, Jonathan K Pritchard, and Yoav Gilad. 2014. “Methylation Qtls Are Associated with Coordinated Changes in Transcription Factor Binding, Histone Modifications, and Gene Expression Levels.” PLoS Genetics 10 (9). Public Library of Science.
Baranasic, Damir. 2020. JASPAR2020: Data Package for Jaspar Database (Version 2020). http://jaspar.genereg.net/.
Bonder, Marc Jan, René Luijk, Daria V Zhernakova, Matthijs Moed, Patrick Deelen, Martijn Vermaat, Maarten Van Iterson, et al. 2017. “Disease Variants Alter Transcription Factor Levels and Methylation of Their Binding Sites.” Nature Genetics 49 (1). Nature Publishing Group:131.
Chèneby, Jeanne, Zacharie Ménétrier, Martin Mestdagh, Thomas Rosnet, Allyssa Douida, Wassim Rhalloussi, Aurélie Bergon, Fabrice Lopez, and Benoit Ballester. 2019. “ReMap 2020: a database of regulatory regions from an integrative analysis of Human and Arabidopsis DNA-binding sequencing experiments.” Nucleic Acids Research 48 (D1):D180–D188. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz945.
Fornes, Oriol, Jaime A Castro-Mondragon, Aziz Khan, Robin Van der Lee, Xi Zhang, Phillip A Richmond, Bhavi P Modi, et al. 2020. “JASPAR 2020: Update of the Open-Access Database of Transcription Factor Binding Profiles.” Nucleic Acids Research 48 (D1). Oxford University Press:D87–D92.
Reese, Sarah E, Cheng-Jian Xu, T Herman, Mi Kyeong Lee, Sinjini Sikdar, Carlos Ruiz-Arenas, Simon K Merid, et al. 2019. “Epigenome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Dna Methylation and Childhood Asthma.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 143 (6). Elsevier:2062–74.
Schep, Alicia. 2020. Motifmatchr: Fast Motif Matching in R.
Silva, Tiago C, Simon G Coetzee, Nicole Gull, Lijing Yao, Dennis J Hazelett, Houtan Noushmehr, De-Chen Lin, and Benjamin P Berman. 2019. “ELMER V. 2: An R/Bioconductor Package to Reconstruct Gene Regulatory Networks from Dna Methylation and Transcriptome Profiles.” Bioinformatics 35 (11). Oxford University Press:1974–7.
Yin, Yimeng, Ekaterina Morgunova, Arttu Jolma, Eevi Kaasinen, Biswajyoti Sahu, Syed Khund-Sayeed, Pratyush K Das, et al. 2017. “Impact of Cytosine Methylation on Dna Binding Specificities of Human Transcription Factors.” Science 356 (6337). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Zhu, Heng, Guohua Wang, and Jiang Qian. 2016. “Transcription Factors as Readers and Effectors of Dna Methylation.” Nature Reviews Genetics 17 (9). Nature Publishing Group:551–65.